Adopt Help Adopt Help
Want to Adopt? Click here
Adopt Help
Pregnant? Click here
Adoptive Parenting Blog

03/07/06

Carrying on the Family Name

Posted by : Dr. G in Adoptive Parenting Blog at 02:44 pm , 542 words, 111 views  
Categories: Adoption-related Issues
So. I'm chatting with a woman that I had just met and whom I did not expect to encounter again when she starts to talk about adoption. I don't automatically launch into an "I know all about adoption" conversation with every passing acquaintence. Sometimes, (gasp!) I just listen. Imagine that! (My darling husband swears that is a lie because he cannot fathom me ever just listening.)

At any rate, I am, in fact, just listening and this woman mentions that her husband is adamant that they adopt a girl. They already have a biological daughter. The woman said she was hoping to adopt a boy. She admitted to wanting to live out her one-boy-one-girl fantasies and she figured that since she was in a position to actually make this happen, then her preference was to try to adopt a boy.

However, come to find out her husband was dead set against adopting a boy. He had been an only child and the family name was going to end with him. So, he did not want the family name being carried on by a male child who was not biologically related to him! Huh?

SPONSOR
Adoption Associates, Inc.

I was, and am still, totally perplexed by this. In fact, when I heard this I thought "Geez. What a jerk!" Obviously, I didn't know this woman well enough to ask her more about how she felt about all of this. Quite frankly, I was only entertaining the conversation to be polite. We parted ways and I wished her well with whatever her fate was to be.

I was fairly dismissive of the conversation, until, UNTIL, I arrived home and mentioned it to my husband with one of those "you're never going to believe this" intros. You see, I assumed he would see the matter from the same perspective as I did. He did not. He said he UNDERSTOOD, totally. We talked about it and he never could make me get it. I still don't. (Sigh)

Alrighty people. (In my best Roseann Rosanna Dana impression) Ya know how you're married to somebody for a hundred years and then one day you suddenly find out something about them that you didn't know and you discover that it just happened to not turn out to be a big deal because of something as fickle as fate? That feeling? Well, that's what happened, to me! I, Roseann Rosanna Dana... Oh, sorry. Impression over.

This business of carrying on the family name was a non-issue for us. It was a non-issue for me, because, well, I just didn't think about it. It was a non-issue for my hsuband because we already had a biological son. Like the woman I met, I wanted to live out my one-boy one-girl fantasies and so we went into adoption seeking a girl. Well the fantasy bloomed into reality and we have two girls and one boy. But, I just learned yesterbleepinday that if we had already had a girl, then adopting a boy might have been--a problem.

Now this is an adoptive parenting topic I never would have thought to even mention, had it not been for a so-called chance encounter while shopping. I presume this is a guy thing? Can somebody out there please enlighten me?

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Ellen Rardin [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
Nope,Dr. G. this is very common. Nowadays,you se this in international adoption,where I would guess the desire for girls over boys is at least 3:1. But it goes back farther than that. Typically,in domestic adoption,its not generally possible to request a girl or boy. But back in the era where it was possible,records demonstrate that girls were requested much more thsn boys.You can read about this in Barbar Melosh's Adoption The American Way of Kinship. I think it does have to do with a sometimes concious and sometimes unconcious family lineage thing. Also,I think in "stranger adoptions" people at some level see girls as less threatening than boys. Weird but true.
PermalinkPermalink 03/07/06 @ 20:36
Comment from: Bill [Member] Email · http://foster-care.adoptionblogs.com/
Yeah,
I wouldn't willingly adopt a boy, but not because of the family lineage thing. I have three younger sisters, and so was always around females. Girls, to me, are much more interesting. It seems like boys just want to go out and kill things. And how much fun is that?

But, if we had a boy, it would be a different story. I still wouldn't know what to do with him, but I would accept that it was meant to happen, and love him just as much as we do our daughter.
PermalinkPermalink 03/10/06 @ 05:16
Comment from: jacq1960 [Member] Email
As an abandoned adoptee from Hong Kong I don't have any surname or real birthday. I have to admit I don't (and probably will never) understand why the carrying on of a family name is so important. We all have to die and then what use is the last name? Does it look nice on the tombstone?

However I do understand that blood is thicker than water and no wonder so many adoptees have this feeling of alienation. But as a birthmother once said to me, "tough luck".

I onced asked some adoptive parents why they prefered girls - I was told they felt that girls would look after them in their old age while boys probably wouldn't.

I believe it.
PermalinkPermalink 04/24/06 @ 18:31
Comment from: hopefulmom [Member] Email
personally I dont get it. Boys, girls, who cares! Babies are babies, kids are kids. Love them all and once the adotion is finalized they are YOUR KIDS no matter how they arrived.
PermalinkPermalink 07/21/06 @ 23:14
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

AdoptHelp
Choose an Option









Pregnant?
click here
AdoptHelp.com

Misc

Subscribe to Adoptive Parenting Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 80