Adopt Help Adopt Help
Want to Adopt? Click here
Adopt Help
Pregnant? Click here
Adoptive Parenting Blog

11/28/06

A new look at adoption statistics

Posted by : Dr. G in Adoptive Parenting Blog at 07:24 pm , 554 words, 65 views  
Categories: Adoption Process
I found this article today which reports some new statistics on adoption.

The study was released a week ago by the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institue. I am not familiar with this particular organization so I am unable to address what their adoption philosophy is, or if they have a particular agenda regarding adoption. However, the report is entitled Safeguarding the Rights and Well-Being of Birthparents in the Adoption Process, so that at least tells me what the emphasis is for this particular study. Here is a quote from the article:

Today, a woman who places her child up for adoption is more apt to be in her 20s, living on her own, and often raising other children, according to Donaldson researchers. Most birth mothers have graduated from high school, many have college educations, and some may even be in graduate school. A few are married.

And far from surrendering her baby and never looking back, the mother typically wants regular updates and periodic contact with her child -- and is likely to suffer chronic grief if she fails to achieve it.

"The notion that women could ever part with a child they created and just forget about it is nonsense," said Adam Pertman, executive director of the Donaldson Institute in New York.

SPONSOR
 


There isn't a lot of information offered in the article about the specifics of the study. I'd like to know more about the actual research that was involved, how the data was obtained, and what the sources were for some of the statements made in the article. Although, I don't feel like there is a lot of substance to the article, the issues that are raised are important ones. I just don't feel like they are addressed in enough detail.

When time allows, I will do a little more internet research and see what I can find out about this particular institute. I will report back with what I learn.

I have been fascinated by what appears to be a trend towards strongly encouraging open adoption. I am pro-choice on the issue. I believe the choice as to whether an adoption is closed or open is up to the parents, all of the parents. Surrendering parents who want an open adoption should be matched with adopting parents who agree with that choice. Adopting parents who want a closed adoption should be matched with children for whom closed adoption is an option.

In previous posts I have written that I believe the emphasis on open adoptions probably produces a coercive atmosphere for some adopting parents. I can't say for certain, but it just seems to make sense to me that some adoptive parents would feel pressured into agreeing to an open adoption if they ever hope to be matched with a child. Maybe this is a phenomenon that has already been studied. Does anyone out there know if it has been addressed elsewhere?

I read a post on another blog at www.adoptions.com some months ago suggesting that the large numbers of international adoptions were driven, in part, by adoptive parents who did not want to have contact with surrendering parents. I don't know if that is at all accurate, but it is an interesting point to consider. Does anyone have any information on this particular phenomenon, if it even exists?




Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Sandra Hanks Benoiton [Member] Email · http://international.adoptionblogs.com/
The Adoption Institute is extremely well regarded. Adam Pertman, their executive director, is, "... the author of "Adoption Nation: How the Adoption Revolution is Transforming America" (Basic Books) one of the most important and influential books ever written in the field. He also founded the Adoption Nation Education Initiative, which will be integrated into the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute as a new and innovative division devoted exclusively to educational activities."

Jenna has been doing a series on this report on her FIrst Parent blog that takes an indepth look at each aspect it bit by bit.

The link for the whole report:
http://www.adoptioninstitute.org/research/2006_11_birthparent_wellbeing.php
PermalinkPermalink 11/28/06 @ 20:10
Comment from: Dr. G [Member] Email · http://adoptive-parenting.adoptionblogs.com/
well that was easy. there you have it folks. everything you need to know about the "extremely well regarded" Adoption Institute.

and wow, "one of the most important and influential books ever written in the field." goodness. obviously i should try to learn something about this man. and his importance. and his influence. ooookay. make that yet another book to add to my ever growing list.

for now, i shall simply scoot on over to the link for the report and become better informed.

oh, as always...thank you Sandra.

PermalinkPermalink 11/28/06 @ 20:22
Comment from: Jenna Hatfield [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
Yep, I'm in the middle of talking about the study. I just got sidetracked the past two days with bottle and binky debacles!

Pertman is pretty awesome. :)
PermalinkPermalink 11/28/06 @ 20:26
Comment from: Dr. G [Member] Email · http://adoptive-parenting.adoptionblogs.com/
okay, i'll stop by your site and check out what you've posted so far Jenna.
PermalinkPermalink 11/28/06 @ 20:57
Comment from: Jan Baker [Member] Email · http://birthfamily-search.adoptionblogs.com/
The interesting thing about Adam Pertman is that not all adoptive parents like him, nor do all birth parents. In essence he is too radical in some of his views for adoptive parents, and not radical enough for some birth parents. However, I think he is well respected in general. I heard him once at a conference and mostly liked what he said.

He is an adoptive dad of two, and got involved in adoption after writing series in a newspaper a few years back about adoption.Think it was the Boston Globe. He was nominated for a Pulitzer. Before his adoption work, he was a writer and editor for many years.
PermalinkPermalink 11/28/06 @ 21:48
Comment from: janetgen [Member] Email
So ... I don't understand Adam Pertman's motivation. Does he hope that "sweetening the deal" for unmarried, pregnant women will increase the number who relinquish? I am sorry to sound so cynical about this study, but having seen the way the adoption industry tried to manipulate my daughter into relinquishing her son, I am immediately suspicous of anyone who wants to make adoption look more appealing. I suspect that he is looking for a new angle to increase the number of babies available for adoption.

Does anyone know the source of the $$s for the study?

Happy G'Ma
PermalinkPermalink 11/28/06 @ 22:03
Comment from: Dr. G [Member] Email · http://older-parent.adoptionblogs.com/
thanks for the additional insight Jan about how Pertman is perceived in different quarters of the adoption community. you know me, i always appreciate hearing *every* possible angle.

janetgan--i'll have to read more about this Pertman fella but from what little i've been able to gather after reading the link to the report and reading Jenna's blog it doesn't seem that his angle is to "sweeten the deal" as you put it. at least that's not my take. you may pick up something differently though. check out the links provided and let me know what you think. i'd be interested to hear back from you.

i'd also be interested in hearing more about your daughter's experience with the adoption industry. it sounds like something we might all benefit from hearing about if you (or she) would be willing or at liberty to share any of the information.

after reading The Girls Who Went Away it would be awful to know that young women and girls are still being coerced in any way into adoption.
PermalinkPermalink 11/28/06 @ 22:06
Comment from: Sandra Hanks Benoiton [Member] Email · http://international.adoptionblogs.com/
Pertman's motivation? I don't know where the idea of "sweetening the deal" came from, but it's not some that would come out of Pertman's mouth or the Adoption Institute. For anyone suspecious, there is a lot of information available.

Here's a link for the Institute's annual reports:
http://www.adoptioninstitute.org/about/annualreport.php
Here's one to their principles and values:
http://www.adoptioninstitute.org/about/principles.php

Jenna,
I can't stop saying, "bottle and binky debacle" ... it's got such wonderful cadence.
PermalinkPermalink 11/28/06 @ 22:32
Comment from: Sandra Hanks Benoiton [Member] Email · http://international.adoptionblogs.com/
And, Doc, coercion happens every day. (And that's one of the issues Pertman and co address.) It is a different time, but stresses of a crisis pregnancy still set women up to be pressured. Some are pressured to place. Some are pressured to abort. Some are pressured to parent.
In other parts of the world, some are pressured to sell their children to slavers.
Yes, it's awful, but we need to acknowledge the reality.
PermalinkPermalink 11/28/06 @ 22:43
Comment from: Heather Lowe [Member] Email · http://unplanned-pregnancy.adoptionblogs.com/
G'Ma wrote:
Does anyone know the source of the $$s for the study?

Well, I donated, for one. As with most studies of this type, the Institute sought donations and grants.
PermalinkPermalink 11/29/06 @ 05:27
Comment from: Jenna Hatfield [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
Yes, sadly, coercion is still alive and well. It is the hope that studies like these and articles like the one I participated in (I also participated in the study) will help foster change.
PermalinkPermalink 11/29/06 @ 06:38
Comment from: Dr. G [Member] Email · http://adoptive-parenting.adoptionblogs.com/
thanks Jenna. hopefully it will.
PermalinkPermalink 11/29/06 @ 07:05
Comment from: Michelle Vandepas [Member] Email · http://fost-adopt.adoptionblogs.com/
Hey Dr. G. I wanted to post on the I hate adoption, but did you close comments on it? (you really are tired of comments eh?)....


.....I know exactly how you feel - if you open comments I'll post to it.
also I've sent you email re: older ... mav
PermalinkPermalink 11/29/06 @ 09:27
Comment from: janetgen [Member] Email
Thanks, Heather, for your comment about the source of $$s for the study. You're vouching for it makes it credible in my eyes!

Happy G'Ma
PermalinkPermalink 11/29/06 @ 17:59
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

AdoptHelp
AdoptHelp
AdoptHelp
AdoptHelp

Misc

Subscribe to Adoptive Parenting Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 74